Today's hottest deals

Biostar N68S3B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar N68S3B  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 01 '16 at 21:28
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 42
2-Core 74.2
42% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 75.2
8-Core 67.8
10% 71.5 Pts
64-Core 80
5% 80 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Palit(1569 0F00) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 1.19
4% 3.54 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 3.39
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Dis 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O061 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 244
Write 80.9
Mixed 115
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 12.7
54% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 11.6
13% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 64%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
300GB free
Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 69.5
Write 88
Mixed 72.3
58% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.26
65% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 6GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 8
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68S3B Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N68S3B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback