ECS GeForce6100PM-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardECS GeForce6100PM-M2  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 09:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 58.2
39% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 90.1
8-Core 94.9
12% 92.5 Pts
64-Core 95.4
6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36EC) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 46 19 79 70 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 147
Write 108
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 68.2
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0000000Q0990037000 4GB
400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.9% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GeForce6100PM-M2 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS GeForce6100PM-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $102
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback