Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AERO 16 OLED BSF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 16 OLED BSF  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 191
2-Core 374
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 718
8-Core 1,068
111% 893 Pts
64-Core 1,781
110% 1,781 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 168
Parallax 178
132% 169 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 149
Splatting 111
129% 166 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 125%
Great: 154%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 1TB
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIOM31.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,503
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,351
364% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 103
333% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 2,058
DQ Write 1,468
DQ Mixed 1,910
1,387% 1,812 MB/s
Poor: 239% Great: 482%
Seagate One Touch HDD 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 132
Mixed 69.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.2
114% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 29.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 20.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 16 OLED BSF Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 16 OLED BSF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback