LG 14Z980-G.AA52B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 14Z980-G.AA52B  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 14Z980
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 157
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 356
40% 312 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1854 0300) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 3
2% 3 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 218 220 215 217 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 427
Mixed 384
SusWrite 231
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 45.6
151% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 353
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 111%
Vickter NVMe 512GB
421GB free
Firmware: H220303a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 945 985 904 1001 886 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,165
Write 1,094
Mixed 1,037
SusWrite 936
238% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 58
194% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 546
374% 457 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 183%
Great: 266%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 MEM-DOWN 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.1% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14Z980-G.AA52B Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: LG 14Z980-G.AA52B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback