Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3209L6M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 3209L6M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130321
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 10:22
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 449
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
AMD(1002 010A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 5.1
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 219 197 206 200 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 435
Write 358
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 219
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 0.7
16% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 31.6
42% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 60%
Netac 320GB 320GB
155GB free
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 223 81 15 91 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.6% Average
Read 259
Write 230
Mixed 222
SusWrite 91.3
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 18
88% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 98.3
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 1
15% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 86%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
932GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 58
Write 19.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 24.8
36% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
36% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3209L6M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 3209L6M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback