Asus MINIPC PN64

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus MINIPC PN64  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PN64
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 176
2-Core 342
98% 192 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 798
80% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,336
83% 1,336 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 87F2) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 20.8
15% 19.9 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 15.3
16% 20 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 980
Write 1,052
Mixed 886
218% 973 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 50
164% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 580
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 515
362% 465 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
384GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84
Write 86.7
Mixed 32.7
82% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40S5.M4A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MINIPC PN64 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Asus MINIPC PN64

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback