Viglen DQ77CP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemViglen DQ77CP  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '23 at 16:05
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 178
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 314
35% 277 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 18.5
11% 16.2 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.2
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate IronWolf 1TB (2016)-$57
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 129 129 147 143 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 160
Write 157
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 132
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
321GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 117
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
230GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 80.2
Write 73.8
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 75.4
97% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CH9 24GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 9.6
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ77CP Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Viglen DQ77CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $505
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback