Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_D409DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_D409DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409DAP
Memory3.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 10:00
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 38.5
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 70.1
29% 48.9 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 128
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 10A2) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44.13
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.7
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5
Splatting 9.2
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 206 175 168 164 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 614
Write 587
Mixed 502
SusWrite 204
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 17.1
57% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 115
87% 118 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_D409DA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_D409DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback