Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U9413

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U9413  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB300
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 43
1-Core 129
2-Core 187
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 458
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E26 00B9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3689
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 14.4
10% 14.5 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BL7 512GB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 704 855 888 1159 1164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 725
Write 516
Mixed 443
SusWrite 865
143% 637 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 23.8
75% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 78.7
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 225
135% 142 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 338%
Jmicron Tech 256GB
234GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 284 311 330 375 376 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 31
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 36.6
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback