Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X10DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 09:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 33.5
2-Core 66.8
42% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 221
21% 174 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.39
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 14.6
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$89
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 60 85 75 61 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 321
Write 127
Mixed 161
SusWrite 73.3
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 16
56% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 61
55% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 79%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 58 60 61 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 66.7
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 59.5
129% 177 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
386% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 161%
Great: 161%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung(date:14/44) M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback