Virtuozzo OpenStack Compute

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive7.64% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVirtuozzo OpenStack Compute  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 15:20
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Memory 5.57
1-Core 19.1
2-Core 91
16% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 123
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 13 20 17 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.64% Terrible
Read 118
Write 33.6
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 17.3
12% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
6% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Virtuozzo 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 38.9
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 447
9% 447 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback