HP 2000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP 2000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3577
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '16 at 20:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 47.7
1-Core 18.6
2-Core 23
23% 29.8 Pts
4-Core 27.2
8-Core 32.9
4% 30.1 Pts
64-Core 34
2% 34 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.1.1000
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1
1% 0.76 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 463
Write 313
Mixed 387
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 8.82
34% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 38.9
DQ Write 38.6
DQ Mixed 16.8
19% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU1-DJ-F 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 2000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback