Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 7D8JCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemLenovo 7D8JCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault 1052
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 13:31
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2324G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 49
1-Core 146
2-Core 313
85% 169 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 520
65% 496 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Legend(17AA 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 10.4
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 10.5
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 456GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 414 357 439 417 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 929
Write 358
Mixed 348
SusWrite 399
112% 509 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 18.7
67% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 173
150% 226 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung CME4WEC8C2K1472SDV 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7D8JCTO1WW Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7D8JCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback