Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2324G 19 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 49 1-Core 146 2-Core 313 85% 169 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 520 65% 496 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P750 14 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 1052) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.43% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 13.4 Parallax 10.4 7% 10.7 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 10.5 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.43% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 456GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 414 357 439 417 425 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 929 Write 358 Mixed 348 SusWrite 399 112% 509 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 18.7 67% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 173 150% 226 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung CME4WEC8C2K1472SDV 1x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.7% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 14 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 10.8 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E-2324GIntelBench 72%, 19 samples	8x
Xeon E-2356GIntelBench 79%, 22 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics P750IntelBench 6%, 14 samples	9x

SSD
Raid 1 Volume 456GBIntelBench 88%, 89 samples	2x
Raid 1 Volume 912GBIntelBench 95%, 51 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M391A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 45%, 14 samples	3x
CME4WEC8C2K1472SDV 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 2 samples	2x
M391A1K43DB2-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 84%, 15 samples	1x