LG 15Z970-A.AAS7U1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLG 15Z970-A.AAS7U1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 15Z970
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170518
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '17 at 21:57
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 204
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 293
40% 295 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1854 0273) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4718
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.94
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 6.39
4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000B1 512GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 473
Mixed 491
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 38.4
152% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.2
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 27.1
62% 119 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-TF MEM-DOWN 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 22.8
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15Z970-A.AAS7U1 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: LG 15Z970-A.AAS7U1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback