Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II Neo K325 Dual-Core 193 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 20.3 25% 31.4 Pts	4-Core 26.2 8-Core 31 4% 28.6 Pts	64-Core 35.4 2% 35.4 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 97 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0470) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.24% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.31 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 0.61 0% 0.69 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.24% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 323GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 71.9 Write 35.1 Mixed 43.5 38% 50.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.1 34% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 54%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.26% Terrible	Read 20.3 Write 3.21 Mixed 5.58 9% 9.68 MB/s	4K Read 2.57 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 10% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.26% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unifosa GU6C2303EP02 2x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 5.5 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 4.6 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM