MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics398% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D67
MotherboardMSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)  (all builds)
Memory85.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 23:45
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$529
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 208
2-Core 418
119% 233 Pts
4-Core 828
8-Core 1602
144% 1,215 Pts
64-Core 3,658
226% 3,658 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Lighting 652
Reflection 805
Parallax 801
531% 753 fps
MRender 532
Gravity 566
Splatting 272
355% 457 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 398%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1XHE-00AFY0 1TB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614900WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,466
Write 3911
Mixed 2,972
772% 3,450 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 78.7
282% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,634
DQ Write 1,500
DQ Mixed 1,566
1,175% 1,567 MB/s
Poor: 226% Great: 607%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
313GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 514
Write 494
Mixed 465
110% 491 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.5
204% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
7GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.1
Write 8
Mixed 4.2
12% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH96GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
219% Outstanding
MC Read 138
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 64.4
243% 85.1 GB/s
SC Read 44.6
SC Write 58.9
SC Mixed 48.9
145% 50.8 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 219%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67) Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 272%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $1,369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback