Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 655 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 655 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B5F
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 00:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 320
95% 183 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 918
93% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B5F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.10
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 27.7
16% 20.1 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 20.2
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRZ-2T00-1006 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,419
Write 1,519
Mixed 1,904
432% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 45.1
150% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 235
282% 525 MB/s
Poor: 179% Great: 613%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MF-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 26
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 655 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 655 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback