Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 16:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 27.6
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 121
37% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 206
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jumper 512G 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13241
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 288
Write 290
Mixed 281
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 12.1
44% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 222
163% 213 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback