Positivo C14CU41TV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo C14CU41TV  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CU41TV
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 61.9
37% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 60.8
8-Core 61.5
8% 61.2 Pts
64-Core 60.7
4% 60.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512G 512GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0803A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 106 198 321 284 282 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 390
Write 326
Mixed 324
SusWrite 242
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 86.3
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 30.9
42% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316LS11IB/8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C14CU41TV Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CU41TV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback