Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 19:05
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 168
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 321
39% 301 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 82.9
47% 70.3 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 43.3
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 33 36 32 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 55.2
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 32.9
30% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 76%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
7TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 155 150 144 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 186
Write 140
Mixed 102
SusWrite 147
187% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9NX BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. CM3X2G1600C9NX BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback