Infinix INBOOK X2 SLIM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemInfinix INBOOK X2 SLIM  (all builds)
MotherboardInfinix EM_TG325_200B_V1.0
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 16:42
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 53
1-Core 125
2-Core 202
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 236
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.5
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.3
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee VP1000F256G 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.28
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,035
Write 990
Mixed 761
207% 928 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 31.5
114% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 86.6
89% 146 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 235%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
3GB free, PID null, sandisk 3.2 gen 1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 12.2
Mixed 39.2
50% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.4
103% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 19.2
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 11
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INBOOK X2 SLIM Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Infinix INBOOK X2 SLIM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback