Today's hottest deals

Aftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 21:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 64
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 130
50% 85 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 388
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 97E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 85
Reflection 135
Parallax 86.1
69% 102 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 77.4
74% 93 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE12NVME512 512GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 481 507 505 506 509 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 985
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 603
237% 1,046 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 35.3
117% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 411
295% 384 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 129%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GS481-26N1600 0898 IM48GS88N26-GIIHA0 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 17
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9XXEN_EF_ED Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback