TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion Erazer X7847 MD60537

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X7847 MD60537  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RP6M
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 15:08
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 75.8
34% 55 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 136
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 36.9%
 Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6B01) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.8%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 284
Write 221
Mixed 197
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 4.7
16% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
93GB free
Firmware: V1.16.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 811 594 518 526 566 626 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 1183
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 607
219% 974 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 10.7
59% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 79
DQ Mixed 92.4
70% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 313%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
450GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 80 77 82 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 78.7
Write 82.2
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 78.7
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 45.2%
 Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 Kingston KHX2666C16S4/16G 029E CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 Kingston KHX2666C16S4/16G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Erazer X7847 MD60537 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Medion Erazer X7847 MD60537

CPU
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples5x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples3x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples2x
SSD
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples3x
512GB SSD 512GBLexarBench 143%, 10,530 samples1x
RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples3x
CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 Kingston KHX2666C16S4/16G 029E CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 Kingston KHX2666C16S4/16G 64GBUnknownBench 49%, 1 sample1x
CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 029E CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 24GBUnknownBench 61%, 4 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback