Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1794

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE72 6QF
MotherboardMSI MS-1794  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 24.3
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 109
33% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 233
27% 212 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 116E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 5
4% 16 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 236 245 262 267 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 604
Write 837
Mixed 653
SusWrite 248
132% 585 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 27
86% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 411
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 333
243% 321 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 17.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 291
14% 291 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1794 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1794

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback