Hynix

HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB

HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
BENCHMARKS (55,289)
MKT (0.1%)
BUILDS
(2)

Effective Speed -28%Effective Speed -28%Average Score -31%MC Read -38%, MC Write -22%, MC Mixed -33%Peak Score -61%MC Read -70%, MC Write -54%, MC Mixed -59%Value & Sentiment -55%User Rating -12%, Market Share -97%Nice To Haves -25%SC Read -37%, SC Write -8%, SC Mixed -23%, SC Read -54%, SC Write -31%, SC Mixed -37%, Latency -19%, Latency -30%, Age 9%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Average Bench: 69.7% (81^st of 115)

Based on 55,289 user benchmarks. Model: Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB

Poor: 53%Average: 69.7% Great: 76%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB averaged 30.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.1GB/s

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 25.8GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB is 23.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.2GB/s

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.6ns

Average Bench

(Based on 55,289 samples)

Rank 8169.7%

Min	Avg	Max
17.5	MC Read 25.4	27.8
19.8	MC Write 27.1	29.5
19.2	MC Mixed 22.7	25.5
71.7% 25.1 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
8.08	SC Read 14.2	17.5
14.7	SC Write 25.8	30.4
11.6	SC Mixed 20.6	24.5
57.8% 20.2 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
71.2	Latency 87.6	125
45.6% 87.6 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

USA-User, 14 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

71.1% Very good

MC Read 24.5

MC Write 28.2

MC Mixed 23.8

73% 25.5 GB/s

SC Read 15.3

SC Write 26.9

SC Mixed 20.9

60% 21 GB/s

Latency 83.4

48% 83.4 ns

GRC-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

69.6% Good

MC Read 25.9

MC Write 27.3

MC Mixed 22.4

72% 25.2 GB/s

SC Read 14.1

SC Write 25

SC Mixed 20

56% 19.7 GB/s

Latency 86.8

46% 86.8 ns

GRC-User, 3 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

68% Good

MC Read 25.2

MC Write 26.5

MC Mixed 21.9

70% 24.5 GB/s

SC Read 14.6

SC Write 24.5

SC Mixed 19.8

56% 19.6 GB/s

Latency 87.8

46% 87.8 ns

POL-User, 19 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

66.5% Good

MC Read 23.4

MC Write 26.2

MC Mixed 22.2

68% 23.9 GB/s

SC Read 13.3

SC Write 25.1

SC Mixed 18.9

55% 19.1 GB/s

Latency 85.2

47% 85.2 ns

TUR-User, 3 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

63.9% Good

MC Read 23.4

MC Write 24.2

MC Mixed 20.4

65% 22.7 GB/s

SC Read 12.8

SC Write 24

SC Mixed 19.3

53% 18.7 GB/s

Latency 76.3

52% 76.3 ns

IRL-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

54.1% Above average

MC Read 20.3

MC Write 24.1

MC Mixed 17.7

59% 20.7 GB/s

SC Read 6.6

SC Write 14

SC Mixed 8.9

28% 9.83 GB/s

Latency 107

37% 107 ns

EGY-User, 2 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

53.9% Above average

MC Read 17.1

MC Write 21.6

MC Mixed 21.3

57% 20 GB/s

SC Read 4.2

SC Write 18.1

SC Mixed 9.8

31% 10.7 GB/s

Latency 80.2

50% 80.2 ns

NZL-User, 14 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

51.4% Above average

MC Read 19.2

MC Write 20.6

MC Mixed 17.4

54% 19.1 GB/s

SC Read 8.9

SC Write 13.9

SC Mixed 10.8

32% 11.2 GB/s

Latency 97.1

41% 97.1 ns

IRL-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

50.3% Above average

MC Read 16

MC Write 22

MC Mixed 18.8

54% 18.9 GB/s

SC Read 9.2

SC Write 14.7

SC Mixed 9.5

32% 11.1 GB/s

Latency 126

32% 126 ns

55,289 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 61,256,636 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9550

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	1,210x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	152x
Core i3-6100HIntelBench 56%, 313 samples	4x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	937x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	408x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $325Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	4x

SSD
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 140%, 7,011 samples	221x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	176x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 1TBSamsungBench 155%, 2,610 samples	74x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	355x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark.
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- See speed test results from other users.
- Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2023 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Comments

Added n/a ago.

USA-User

level
9,404

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

3 years ago.

AUS-User

level
3,784

Good

26 days ago.

Anyne managed to get these rams clocked at a higher speed than 2667? Im at 1.2v using 14 14 14 32 bclk 133 x 10 i cant seem to post trying to go any further or should i try different timings and then try multiply it by 11?

Your
opinion?

▲Like ▼Dislike

Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $25
Intel Core i5-12600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hynix

HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB

Average Bench: 69.7% (81st of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Dell XPS 15 9550

Popular HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

Good

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 69.7% (81^st of 115)