Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 16:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 150
2-Core 329
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,072
105% 859 Pts
64-Core 1498
93% 1498 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 135
Parallax 227
92% 158 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 118
Splatting 184
141% 171 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 149 118 117 117 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 476
Write 278
Mixed 323
SusWrite 122
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 27.5
100% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 45.6
75% 144 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 82%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
136GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 125 102 73 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 488
Write 431
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 150
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 16.8
75% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 1.2
79% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 100%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
109GB free
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 388 357 442 465 460 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 149
Write 65
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 422
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 8.4
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.5
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 12.7
10% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST9500620NS 500GB
359GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 56 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 89.4
Write 92.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 56.7
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM4X8GF2133C13K4 Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB CM4X8GF2133C13K4 Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.1% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 24.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 25.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback