Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$40 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 55.3 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 157 56% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 257 34% 252 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Cyx-patch P106-100 25 User benchmarks, average bench 48% EVGA(3842 5162) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 68.9 59% 69.9 fps	MRender 62.4 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 60 51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RX7 NVME 512GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 273GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0926A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 121 15 14 195 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 309 Write 224 Mixed 263 SusWrite 115 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 11.1 56% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 160 127% 182 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 254%
Seagate ST1500LM012-1R817G 1.5TB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 396GB free Firmware: SBK2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 88 88 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 67.2 Write 115 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 89 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 168% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CG3200D4M13508G 1x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.8% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6.9 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	856x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	480x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	372x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	81x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	67x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157