Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706ICB
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 13:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 54.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 243
72% 138 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 536
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16BD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.01
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 8.6
5% 24.3 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 16.4
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 835
Write 604
Mixed 676
157% 705 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 26.7
123% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 595
428% 567 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 323%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 14.2
Mixed 27.3
52% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FEA Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 20
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback