Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FE
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 08:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 175
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 400
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 21.2
13% 19.1 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 15.9
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Lexar SSD NM790 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 1078 991 1166 1288 1296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,728
Write 1,241
Mixed 1,302
SusWrite 1,121
302% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 50.6
188% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 436
332% 458 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 216%
Great: 636%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07CB
Typical Laptop 15s-fq2xxx Builds (Compare 2,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback