Asrock P67 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Performance  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 12:28
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 161
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 375
41% 324 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 96.2
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 98.3
78% 97.7 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 94.9
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 212 216 219 215 222 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 456
Write 285
Mixed 223
SusWrite 219
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 37.8
123% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 209
184% 276 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
799GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 98 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68% Good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 101
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68%
Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
211GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 40 50 42 63 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 78.9
Write 87.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 52.5
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
107% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
625GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 108 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 97
Write 115
Mixed 58
SusWrite 108
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 2626 5TB
2TB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 70 73 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 61.6
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 70.8
84% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 2626 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 70 74 77 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 109
Write 90.1
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 75.5
113% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%
WD Elements SE 2622 5TB
2TB free, PID 2622
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 69 72 75 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 123
Write 108
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 71.8
121% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.7
255% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600LL Series 8502 1600LL Series Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1920 1200 DELA07B DELL U2412M
Typical P67 Performance Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback