Today's hottest deals

MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory121.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 02:47
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 96
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 646
58% 487 Pts
64-Core 1,850
114% 1,850 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 193
Parallax 186
144% 185 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 185
Splatting 126
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 613
Write 642
Mixed 629
141% 628 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 48.6
157% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 430
361% 526 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
775GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,058
Write 965
Mixed 742
205% 921 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 26.9
101% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 57.2
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 71
108% 191 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 298%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HX426C16FB2/16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
MC Read 56.4
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 37.3
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0F14 SAMSUNG
Typical X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) - $289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $1,019
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback