Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Tulpar A7 V14.3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Tulpar A7 V14.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	TULPAR A7 V14.3
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 198 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 377 41% 324 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 102%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Device(1D05 1179) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.7% Average	Lighting 51.1 Reflection 50.3 Parallax 46.7 42% 49.4 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 46.3 Splatting 42.1 42% 52.5 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 72%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 72,765 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Device(1D05 1179) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 13.4 Parallax 12.8 7% 11.7 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 21%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$47 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,080 Write 977 Mixed 326 175% 794 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 4.8 31% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 51.6 DQ Mixed 43 31% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 253%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 199GB free Firmware: 3001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 638 Write 630 Mixed 520 446% 596 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 21.9 4,115% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 88.1 878% 104 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 101%
Wilk USB DISK 2.0 16GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 26.3 Write 0.7 Mixed 2 7% 9.67 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 18% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22S/8G 2x8GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.5% Good	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 26.7 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 20.9 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	49"	1280 720	GSM9E7A LG HDR DQHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A7 V14.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

System: Tulpar A7 V14.3

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	4x

GPU
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	2x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	2x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $108Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	3x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $47Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	1x

RAM
KF3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GBKingstonBench 91%, 1,874 samples	3x
KF3200C20S4/16G 2x16GBKingstonBench 87%, 5,044 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 133% - Outstanding

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340