Today's hottest deals

MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D78
MotherboardMSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 13:02
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$265
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 208
2-Core 421
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,446
136% 1,131 Pts
64-Core 1,918
119% 1,918 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
Intel(8086 1020) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 173
Parallax 239
99% 178 fps
MRender 268
Gravity 200
Splatting 249
196% 239 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 126%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,812
Write 4,335
Mixed 3,378
722% 3,175 MB/s
4K Read 74.8
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 105
373% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,723
DQ Write 1,315
DQ Mixed 1,627
1,188% 1,555 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Toshiba MG09ACA18TE 18TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 52 53 51 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 159
Write 139
Mixed 87
SusWrite 52.8
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.9
251% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 138%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 50 51 50 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 124
Write 131
Mixed 75
SusWrite 51.5
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 49 51 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 68
Write 83.6
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 49.8
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
202% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 90%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
453GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 76 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 85.7
Write 84.3
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 77.3
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
329GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 75.9
Write 69.5
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 44.8
45% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 67%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 67 68 67 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 65.6
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 68
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 141 148 142 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
148% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 51.7
MC Mixed 52
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 49
SC Write 54
SC Mixed 49.1
145% 50.7 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 148%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC0D2 PHL 273V5
Typical PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78) Builds (Compare 623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 210%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback