Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE  (all builds)
Memory245.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 18:24
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w5-3435X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 47.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
80% 156 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 987
92% 765 Pts
64-Core 2,650
164% 2,650 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$269
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,405
Write 4,556
Mixed 2,916
882% 3,959 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 103
354% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 1,113
823% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 475% Great: 926%
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB
15TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 206
Write 210
Mixed 119
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 3.3
12% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 39%
Mushkin MKNSSDAL8TB-D8 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,395
Write 2,326
Mixed 1,492
392% 1,738 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 84.6
262% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,502
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 1,264
946% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 172% Great: 354%
Mushkin MKNSSDAL8TB-D8 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,311
Write 2,275
Mixed 1,471
380% 1,686 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 76.8
253% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 1,013
DQ Mixed 1,262
913% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 172% Great: 354%
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB
13.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 258
Write 249
Mixed 152
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 2.9
15% 5.47 MB/s
DQ Read 10.3
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 8.6
7% 9.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 39%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 316
Write 44.1
Mixed 113
154% 158 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 2.8
796% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 2.7
1,129% 16 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 129%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
23GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.8
Write 4.7
Mixed 10.2
16% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M321R8GA0BB0-CQKEG 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4812 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
138% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 66.2
MC Mixed 60.1
168% 58.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 138%
Great: 253%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 26 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 329%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 429%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback