Today's hottest deals

\acer Aspire M3-581TG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System\acer Aspire M3-581TG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MA50_HX
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 15 '17 at 20:27
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2467M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 88.9
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 89.3
53% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 131
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 067D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 1.44
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.91
2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 20GB
17GB free
Firmware: S5FAM014 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 250
Write 186
Mixed 214
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 6.1
46% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 5.9
18% 38 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA6C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 76.4
Write 70.5
Mixed 78.5
57% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.16
47% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback