Today's hottest deals

Asus WS E900 G4_WS980T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAsus WS E900 G4_WS980T  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory108.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220721
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 07:23
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4216
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 64.2
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 155
56% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 636
55% 470 Pts
64-Core 3,059
189% 3,059 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWR440 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 135 146 149 106 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 192
Mixed 105
SusWrite 128
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF4G72PDZ-3G2F1 4x31.8GB
4 of 12 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 0" 1280 720
Typical WS E900 G4_WS980T Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus WS E900 G4_WS980T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback