Asus X555LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555LF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LF
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 89
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 99
56% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 146
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A6D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 6.5
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZD256 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 338 339 369 403 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 442
Write 359
Mixed 391
SusWrite 333
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 18.3
110% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 35.8
83% 164 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 0467 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 15 60 15.5" 1366 745 BOE078B
Typical X555LF Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback