Skikk Freya 17 II 13th Gen

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemSkikk Freya 17 II 13th Gen  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.eu Freya 17 II 13th Gen
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 14:45
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 60.1
1-Core 182
2-Core 359
102% 200 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 895
92% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,210
75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 51B1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 28
19% 26.9 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 22
21% 26.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$105
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3588 3662 3612 1768 1550 1530 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 2,748
Write 3,067
Mixed 2,808
SusWrite 2,618
635% 2,810 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 82.8
311% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 838
DQ Mixed 1080
793% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 411%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. W-SKIKK48S532G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 44.6
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 21.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 0R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 29% 28 79 1 60 17.2" 1920 1080 CMN1775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback