Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 17:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 225
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 685
77% 603 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2377 2535 2524 2584 2578 2544 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 1,728
Mixed 1146
SusWrite 2,524
379% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 65.5
238% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,458
DQ Write 1,358
DQ Mixed 1,457
1,080% 1,424 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 340%
Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BA08G3200D4TP16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.2
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 31.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 78 55 60 23" 1920 1080 ACR0280 S230HL
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback