GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory41 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 19:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 58.5
1-Core 177
2-Core 343
98% 193 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 617
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M
Device(1E50 8018) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 31.1
14% 22.8 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 40.5
25% 28.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE980Y38900-2TB 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10191
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,925
Write 3,750
Mixed 3,214
810% 3,630 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 75.2
258% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 1,174
796% 967 MB/s
Poor: 290% Great: 563%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB 23h 7500 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 43.9
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 34.3
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 41.5
111% 38.9 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 119%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 6 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7225 SAMSUNG
Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 243% - Outstanding Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback