Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3300 Series MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP Pro 3300 Series MT  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 21:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 127
55% 90 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 208
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
HP(103C 6889) 1.5GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 32.5
16% 25.5 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 24
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 52 74 45 75 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.8% Poor
Read 59.2
Write 158
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 72.4
18% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 12.1
36% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 28.4
60% 122 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 22" 1280 720 ACI22A2 VW222
Typical Pro 3300 Series MT Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3300 Series MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback