Today's hottest deals

Corsair VOYAGER a1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemCorsair VOYAGER a1600  (all builds)
MotherboardCorsair Voyager a1600
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 17:18
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 170
2-Core 336
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 1,193
111% 924 Pts
64-Core 1,399
87% 1,399 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800M
Device(1CFA 0004) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.20.42.04
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 103
Parallax 93.6
45% 83.9 fps
MRender 82.8
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 95.1
67% 80.4 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00A00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1253 1166 1371 1865 1494 1336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,847
Write 1,672
Mixed 1,822
SusWrite 1,414
380% 1,689 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 71.5
224% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 800
554% 707 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 260%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM5S16G1M4800A40S2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 51.4
MC Mixed 43.8
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 30.9
105% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 128%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 7% 30 191 18 240 16" 1707 1067 BOE0A3B
Typical VOYAGER a1600 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Corsair VOYAGER a1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback