Asus PRIME B650-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 09:06
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$394
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 216
2-Core 414
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,642
146% 1,234 Pts
64-Core 2,904
180% 2,904 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$388
Nvidia(10DE 16CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 200
Parallax 219
181% 214 fps
MRender 317
Gravity 174
Splatting 130
160% 207 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 159%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Raider GAMING NVME M400-2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D70 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,116
Write 1,254
Mixed 1,369
349% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 74.7
259% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1,453
992% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 216% Great: 353%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 158
Mixed 87.1
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
880% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40U5.C8A1 CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 63
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 52.8
159% 55.8 GB/s
SC Read 47.6
SC Write 56.8
SC Mixed 50.4
147% 51.6 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 154%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 1R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 23% 56 201 22 60 31.5" 1707 960 IVM7607 PL3270Q
Typical PRIME B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 274%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 262%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback