Acer Veriton S6610G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton S6610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton S6610G
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 20:21
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 70.8
49% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 182
19% 155 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.9
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 49 66 67 72 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 80.8
Write 76.2
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 62.5
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 145 148 145 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 168
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 147
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 193 162 186 189 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Generic External 160GB
51GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 59
Write 20.5
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 24.5
37% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
28% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 20 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D44 C27F398
Typical Veriton S6610G Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Acer Veriton S6610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback