HP 500-130eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-130eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 15:03
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 88
2-Core 171
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 280
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 10.5
6% 8.87 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 78 88 94 88 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 112
Write 80.1
Mixed 57
SusWrite 78.8
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1920 1080 ACR0312 S241HL
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback