HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 20:37
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 62
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 174
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 303
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 5.2
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 236GB
130GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 377 380 384 380 391 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 450
Write 411
Mixed 380
SusWrite 387
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 30.9
113% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 138
124% 182 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 109%
Hua723020ala640 59Y5483 59Y1807IBMV 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: A8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 78 107 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 115
Write 127
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 103
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 10
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 5% 78 13 1 60 24" 1920 1017 DELA037 DELL S2409W
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback