Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X99H
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 03:42
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 179
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 703
62% 526 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 85.3
Reflection 133
Parallax 160
70% 126 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 87.4
Splatting 148
114% 139 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 408 423 414 420 420 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 435
Mixed 244
SusWrite 416
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 34.8
124% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 283
229% 325 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 119%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
55GB free
Firmware: GN001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 49.7
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 42.8
29% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FADP 4x4GB
4 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.8% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 19% 37 215 60 144 24" 1280 720 AOC2460 G2460
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback