Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory13 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 06:43
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 126
55% 89 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 200
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.70
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 18.9
16% 18.3 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 15.7
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U128G1001 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 93 91 89 91 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 204
Write 154
Mixed 106
SusWrite 89.6
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 29.3
88% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 37.4
34% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
466GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 97 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 89.6
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 99.1
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73DB0-CK0 50GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.8% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1920 1057 ACR03E1 K222HQL
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback