Lenovo 4480A5U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4480A5U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 04:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$81
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 119
55% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 252
29% 227 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 3
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.1
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 114 76 80 86 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 150
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 88.7
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1870KC58E9F1333 CT51264BA1339.M16F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 27 60 22" 1680 1027 HWP26A8 HP w2207
Typical 4480A5U Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4480A5U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback