Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAMD
MotherboardAMD A520
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 13:47
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 328
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 865
95% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,086
67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 29.8
18% 24.2 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 21.4
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BTSDA-480G-535 480GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HT3130A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 410 377 423 423 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 421
Mixed 348
SusWrite 405
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 13.8
142% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 14.9
55% 120 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Pop 16GB
1GB free, PID 5577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.9
Write 13.8
Mixed 15.7
22% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3
199% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 30
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 31.3
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 SAM093E T24B350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback